NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Admark Property Group Pty Ltd (in liq) v GJ Building and Contracting Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1309 Hearing dates: 22 August 2016 Decision date: 16 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Corporations List Before: Black J Decision: Respondent to Notice of Motion filed on 20 May 2016 found guilty of contempt. Catchwords: PROCEDURE — Contempt of court — where order sought that director of company be punished for contempt under Part 55 r 13 of the Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) – where company gave undertaking to the Court that a certain amount of monies from proceeds of sale of units would be paid into a controlled money account to be held on trust – where it was contended that the director had caused company to act contrary to that undertaking thereby knowingly impeding the administration of justice – whether it was established beyond reasonable doubt that alleged contemnor had requisite knowledge of undertaking – whether r 36.5 of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) applies to undertakings voluntarily offered to court – whether undertaking was not sufficiently precise to ground a charge of contempt – whether charge of contempt established. Legislation Cited: - Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 136 - Home Building Act 1989 (NSW) - Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW), Pt 55 r 13 - Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 36.5, 40.6 Cases Cited: - ANS Nominees Pty Ltd v Beverley Manufacturing Co Pty Ltd [1979] 2 NSWLR 875; (1979) 4 ACLR 737 - Athens v Randwick City Council [2005] NSWCA 317; (2005) 64 NSWLR 58 - Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Hughes [2001] FCA 38 - Australian Consolidated Press Ltd v Morgan [1965] HCA 21; (1965) 112 CLR 483 - Baker v Paul [2013] NSWCA 426 - CCOM Pty Ltd v Jiejing Pty Ltd (1992) 36 FCR 524 - Chamberlain v R (No 2) [1984] HCA 7; (1984) 153 CLR 521 - Electricity Generation Corporation (t/as Verve Energy) v Woodside Energy Ltd [2014] HCA 7; (2014) 306 ALR 25 - Fajloun v Khoury [2016] NSWCA 101 - Firstmac Fiduciary Services Pty Ltd v Gilmour (No 3) [2013] NSWSC 570 - Iberian Trust Ltd v Founders Trust & Investment Company Ltd [1932] 2 KB 87 - Kayserian Nominees (No 1) Pty Ltd v J R Garner Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 1011 - Kirkpatrick v Kotis [2004] NSWSC 1265; (2004) 62 NSWLR 567 - Microsoft Corporation v Marks (No 1) (1996) 69 FCR 117 at 143; 139 ALR 99 - Mount Bruce Mining Pty Ltd v Wright Prospecting Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 37; (2015) 325 ALR 188 - Pang v Bydand Holdings Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 69 - Re Mycorp Pty Ltd [2014] NSWSC 899 - Reid v Howard (1993) 31 NSWLR 298 - Sigalla v TZ Ltd [2011] NSWCA 334 - Toll (FGCT) Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2004] HCA 52; (2004) 219 CLR 165 - Witham v Holloway [1995] HCA 3; (1995) 183 CLR 525 - Zhu v Treasurer of the State of New South Wales [2004] HCA 56; (2004) 218 CLR 530 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Admark Property Group Pty Limited (in liquidation) (Plaintiff) GJ Building and Contracting Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D R Stack (Plaintiff/Liquidator) D Sulan/J Buncle (Defendant) M Thangaraj SC/M J Dawson (Respondent on Motion)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate