NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Droudis (No. 11) [2016] NSWSC 1319 Hearing dates: 13 September 2016 Date of orders: 14 September 2016 Decision date: 14 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Johnson J Decision: Admit into evidence MFIs 39, 40 and 41. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Judge-alone murder trial - Crown tenders recorded conversations between Accused and Man Monis - discussions occur after Accused informed of police application to obtain forensic samples from her - conversations include discussions concerning possible explanations for presence of Accused's blood and hair at crime scene - whether conversations admissible as evidence of consciousness of guilt - evidence admitted Legislation Cited: Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: Edwards v R [1993] HCA 63; 178 CLR 193 R v Burton [2013] NSWCCA 335; 237 A Crim R 238 R v Lane [2011] NSWCCA 157; 221 A Crim R 309 R v Le [2000] NSWCCA 49 R v Pham [2005] NSWCCA 9 R v Sood [2007] NSWCCA 214 The Queen v Baden-Clay [2016] HCA 35 Texts Cited: --- Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina (Crown) Amirah Droudis (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Tedeschi QC; Mr DT Scully (Crown) Mr MJ Ierace SC; Mr RJ Wilson (Accused)
Solicitors: Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Crown) Legal Aid NSW (Accused) File Number(s): 2013/345405 Publication restriction: ---
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate