NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Barrett v ITW Australia Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1325 Hearing dates: 19 September 2016 Date of orders: 20 September 2016 Decision date: 20 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: 1. Grant leave to the plaintiff pursuant to s 151D(2) of the Workers Compensation Act 1987 to commence these proceedings. 2. Order that the costs of this application be the plaintiff's costs in the proceedings. Catchwords: LIMITATION OF ACTION – leave to commence proceedings – s 151D(2) Workers Compensation Act 1987 – whether leave should be granted – where no prejudice to defendant and where satisfactory explanation for delay COSTS – application for leave to commence proceedings – where application ultimately not opposed – where application necessary whatever defendant's attitude might be – plaintiff entitled to costs as part of costs if successful in proceedings Legislation Cited: Workers Compensation Act 1987 Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 Cases Cited: Itex Graphix Pty Ltd v Elliot (2002) 54 NSWLR 207; [2002] NSWCA 104 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Ronald Charles Barrett (Plaintiff) ITW Australia Pty Ltd (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: B Kelleher (Plaintiff) S L Flett (Defendant)
Solicitors: Burke & Mead Lawyers (Plaintiff) Hall & Wilcox (Defendant) File Number(s): 2016/89760 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate