NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Williams Group Australia Pty Ltd v Crocker [2016] NSWCA 265 Hearing dates: 5 August 2016 Decision date: 22 September 2016 Before: Ward JA at [1]; Simpson JA at [152]; Payne JA at [153] Decision: Appeal dismissed with costs. Catchwords: CONTRACT – guarantee – electronic signature – where director of company did not change password to system by which his electronic signature could be affixed to documents – where electronic signature affixed to application and guarantee without director's knowledge or authority – whether director bound by application of principles of ostensible authority – whether director shut eyes to obvious to justify fixing him with knowledge for purposes of ratification Cases Cited: Brott v The Queen (1992) 173 CLR 426; [1992] HCA 5 Bruce Harvey v State of New South Wales [2006] NSWSC 1436 Chilcotin Pty Ltd v Cenelage Pty Ltd [1999] NSWCA 11 Flexirent Capital Pty Ltd v EBS Consulting Pty Ltd (2007) 14 ANZ Ins Cas 61-732; [2007] VSC 158 Freeman & Lockyer v Buckhurst Park Properties (Mangal) Ltd [1964] 2 QB 480 Fry v Smellie [1912] 3 KB 282 Heperu Pty Ltd v Morgan Brooks Pty Ltd (No 2) [2007] NSWSC 1438 Hugger-Mugger, LLC v NetSuite Inc 2:04-CV-592 TC, 2005 US Dist International Paper Co v Spicer (1906) 4 CLR 739; [1906] HCA 75 L'Estrange v F Graucob Ltd [1934] 2 KB 394 Leybourne v Permanent Custodians Ltd [2010] NSWCA 78 Morison v London County and Westminster Bank Ltd [1914] 3 KB 356 Pacific Carriers Ltd v BNP Paribas (2004) 218 CLR 451; [2004] HCA 35 Petersen v Moloney (1951) 84 CLR 91; [1951] HCA 57 R v Beard (1837) 8 C & P 143 R v Beardsall (1859) 1 F & F 529; 175 ER 839 R v Forbes (1835) 7 C & P 224 R v Parish (1837) 8 C & P 94 Rowe v B&R Nominees Pty Ltd [1964] VR 477 Savery v King (1856) 5 HL Cas 627 Stuart v Hishon [2013] NSWSC 766 Taylor v Smith (1926) 38 CLR 48; [1926] HCA 16 Toll Pty Ltd v Alphapharm Pty Ltd (2004) 219 CLR 165; [2004] HCA 52 Turner v Webb (1941) 42 SR (NSW) 68 Vitek v Estate Homes Pty Ltd [2013] NSWSC 1764 Water Board v Moustakas [1988] HCA 12; 180 CLR 491 Williams Group Australia Pty Ltd v Crocker [2015] NSWSC 1907 Texts Cited: G E Dal Pont, Law of Agency (3rd ed, 2014, LexisNexis) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Williams Group Australia Pty Ltd (Appellant) Lee Anthony Crocker (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: IE Davidson SC with Ms LE Hulmes (Appellant) VF Kerr (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate