NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Regina v Jay Lindsay John Curtis-Hodge [2016] NSWDC 222 Hearing dates: 11 August, 15 September 2016 Date of orders: 15 September 2016 Decision date: 15 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Judge AC Scotting Decision: Section 9 Bond Matters:
1 I find that the section 9 bonds have been breached and I take no further action.
Section 12 Bond Matters:
2 The good behaviour bonds are revoked. 3 In relation to the offence of intimidating Mr Whiteman the offender is sentenced to imprisonment for 15 months, with a non-parole period of 10 months to date from 7 October 2014. 4 In relation to the offence of intimidating Ms Byrnes the offender is sentenced to imprisonment for 15 months, with a non-parole period of 10 months to date from 7 October 2014.
Sentence Matters: 5 In relation to the police pursuit offence the offender is convicted. I impose a sentence of imprisonment consisting of a non-parole period of 12 months to date from 7 April 2015 and a head sentence of 18 months. 6 In relation to the robbery offence the offender is convicted. I impose a sentence of imprisonment consisting of a non-parole period of 3 years and 3 months years to date from 7 January 2016 and a head sentence of 5 years and 9 months. 7 Taking into account the terms of imprisonment imposed for the suspended sentences, the total effective sentence I have imposed for all matters is 7 years with a non-parole period of 4 years and 6 months to date from 7 October 2014. The offender will be eligible to be released on parole on 6 April 2019. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – offence - plea of guilty – robbery in company – police pursuit – drive recklessly – stalk/ intimidate – assault – common assault –assault occasioning actual bodily harm SENTENCE – mitigating factors – aggravating factors – circumstances – background of offender – mental illness - treatment – objective seriousness – specific deterrence – general deterrence – appropriate penalty – revocation of good behaviour bonds – custodial sentence SENTENCE PRINCIPLES – parity – totality – community values – remorse – contrition – Fernando principles – Bugmy principles – Henry Principles Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 ss 51B, 97, Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 ss 5, 9, 12, 21A(2)(d), 21A(2)(j), 21A(2)(l), 21A(2)(o), 21A(3)(i), 21A(3)(k), 22, 24(a), 47(3), 98(3), 99, 99(2), 99(4) Cases Cited: R v McNaughton (2006) 66 NSWLR 566 Baumer v R (1988) 166 CLR 51 BW v R [2011] NSWCCA 176 R v Wilkinson (No 5) [2009] NSWSC 432 R v Thomson & Houlton (2000) 49 NSWLR 383 R v Borkowski (2009) 195 A Crim R 1 Barbaro v The Queen (2010) 253 CLR 58 Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520 Palijan v R [2010] NSWCCA 142 R v Scognamiglio (1991) 56 A Crim R 81 R v Wright (1997) 93 A Crim R 48 and R v Lawrence [2005] NSWCCA 91 R v Dinh [2010] NSWCCA 74 Lambert v R [2015] NSWCCA 22 Muldrock v R (2011) 244 CLR 120 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 R v Todorovic [2008] NSWCCA 49 R v Engert (1995) 84 A Crim R 67 Green v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462 R v Fernando (1992) 65 A Crim R 98 Bugmy v R (2013) 249 CLR 571 R v Henry (1999) 46 NSWLR 346 Category: Sentence Parties: Regina (The Crown) Jay Lindsay John Curtis-Hodge (Offender) Representation: Counsel: Mr T Edwards (Offender)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate