NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lam v Rolls Royce PLC (No 5) [2016] NSWSC 1332 Hearing dates: 16 September 2016 Date of orders: 16 September 2016 Decision date: 16 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: (1) Order that all claims by group members for damages or other relief against the defendant arising out of the events onboard QF32 on 4 November 2010 who have not, in accordance with the orders made on 27 March 2015, registered their intention to claim compensation for psychological injury and who are listed in annexure A be dismissed pursuant to s 183 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW); (2) Order that the dismissal of the claims identified in order (1) is to operate as a final determination of the rights of the individual group members listed in annexure A to claim damages or other relief against the defendant arising out of the events onboard QF32 on 4 November 2010. Catchwords: REPRESENTATIVE ACTION – class closure – dismissal of claim by non-registered group members – order that dismissal operates as final determination of claims Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2003] VSC 212 King v AG Australia Holdings Limited [2002] FCA 1560 Lam v Rolls Royce PLC [2013] NSWSC 805 Lam v Rolls Royce PLC (No 3) [2015] NSWSC 83 Lam v Rolls Royce (No 4) [2016] NSWSC 487 Matthews v SPI Electricity Pty Ltd (2013) 39 VR 255; [2013] VSC 17 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Sandy Lam (Plaintiff) Rolls Royce PLC Reg No 4706930 (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: J.E. Rowe (Plaintiff) N.E. Chen (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate