NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Golden v V'landys [2016] NSWCA 300 Hearing dates: 22 September 2016 Decision date: 04 November 2016 Before: McColl JA at [1]; Leeming JA at [2]; Payne JA at [3]. Decision: (1) leave to appeal granted;
(2) the affidavit of Mr Golden sworn 6 September 2016 is admitted as evidence on this appeal pursuant to s 75A of the Supreme Court Act;
(3) further amended notice of appeal to be filed within 7 days of the date of publication of this judgment;
(4) ground 4 of the further amended notice of appeal is upheld;
(5) all remaining grounds of the further amended notice of appeal are dismissed;
(6) set aside orders of Adamson J of 17 November 2015 and in lieu thereof order:
(a) the decision of the first respondent dated 24 June 2011 to warn off the appellant from all race tracks controlled by the second respondent is quashed;
(b) the first and second respondents to pay 75 per cent of the appellant's costs of the appeal as agreed or assessed;
(c) within 7 days of the publication of this judgment the appellant to file submissions about the appropriate order for costs before the primary judge;
(d) within 14 days of the publication of this judgment the first and second respondents to file submissions about the appropriate order for costs before the primary judge;
(e) within 21 days of the publication of this judgment the appellant file submissions in reply about the appropriate order for costs before the primary judge. Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW - decision of Racing NSW to warn off applicant from race courses - apprehended bias - whether fair minded observer might reasonably apprehend decision-maker might not apply impartial mind - whether logical connection between letter of demand from decision-maker's solicitors and apprehended deviation from making decision on merits - whether role in initiating warning off decision incompatible with making decision - whether claim of improper purpose established - failure to bring appeal within time - whether relief should be withheld as a matter of discretion - appeal allowed in part and decision quashed
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate