NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Garth v R [2016] NSWCCA 203 Hearing dates: 2 June 2016 Date of orders: 22 September 2016 Decision date: 22 September 2016 Before: Bathurst CJ at [1]; Beazley P at [36]; Simpson JA at [37] Decision: Leave to appeal refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal – assault causing death – whether indictment charging an offence under s 25A of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) discloses an offence punishable by law – whether appropriate to determine constitutional question Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 61 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 19A, 25A, 25B, 35 Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 5F Interpretation Act 1937 (NSW), s 31 Cases Cited: CGU Insurance Ltd v Blakeley (2016) 90 ALJR 272; [2016] HCA 2 Doja v The Queen (2009) 198 A Crim R 349; [2009] NSWCCA 303 at [5] Lambert v Weichelt (1954) 28 ALJR 282 Ngo v The Queen (2013) 233 A Crim R 121; [2013] NSWCCA 142 R v Mai (1992) 26 NSWLR 371 at 377 Tajjour v State of New South Wales (2014) 254 CLR 508; [2014] HCA 35 Universal Film Manufacturing Company (Australasia) Limited v State of New South Wales (1927) 40 CLR 333; [1927] HCA 50 Wurridjal v The Commonwealth (2009) 237 CLR 309; [2009] HCA 2 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hugh Bacalla Garth (Applicant) Crown (First Respondent) Attorney-General for New South Wales (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Bashir SC / B Lim (Applicant) F Veltro (First Respondent) M G Sexton SC / B K Baker (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate