NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Harris v Waverley Council [2016] NSWLEC 1430 Hearing dates: Conciliation conference on 21 July 2016 Date of orders: 20 September 2016 Decision date: 20 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: Fakes C Decision: See (4) below Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION; pool; earthworks; retaining wall; amenity; conciliation conference; agreement between the parties; orders Legislation Cited: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew Harris (Applicant) Waverley Council (Respondent) Representation: Applicant: Mr R Wilcher (Solicitor) Respondent: Mr S Patterson (Solicitor)
Solicitors: Applicant: Hicksons Lawyers Respondent: Wiltshire Webb Staunton Beattie Lawyers File Number(s): 151987 of 2016 Publication restriction: No
Judgment 1. COMMISSIONER: In this matter, at or after a conciliation conference, an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 (the Court Act) was reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision in the proceedings that was acceptable to the parties. As the presiding Commissioner, I was satisfied that the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions (this being the test applied by s 34(3) of the Court Act). As a consequence, s 34(3)(a) of the Act required me to "dispose of the proceedings in accordance with the decision". 2. The Court Act also required me to "set out in writing the terms of the decision" (s 34(3)(b)). The orders made to give effect to the agreement constitute that document. 3. In making the orders to give effect to the agreement between the parties, I was not required to, and have not, made any merit assessment of the issues that were originally in dispute between the parties. 4. The final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement under s34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 are: 1. Leave is granted to rely on the amended plans listed in condition 1 of the conditions set out in Annexure A. 2. The Applicant is to pay Council's costs thrown away in the agreed amount of $500 within 14 days. 3. The appeal be upheld; 4. Development consent be granted to the development application 67/2015 the construction for a new swimming pool, deck and cabana at rear, relocation of existing retaining wall to side and rear boundaries and landscaping, and change of use of the duplex to a residential dwelling house at 30 Dellview Street Tamarama, on conditions set out in Annexure A. ________________________ Judy Fakes Commissioner of the Court 151987.16 Annexure A (179 KB, pdf) 151987.16 LP1-3 (301 KB, pdf) 151987.16 LP4 (451 KB, pdf) DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated. Decision last updated: 22 September 2016
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate