NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Rothe v Scott (No. 5) [2016] NSWDC 225 Hearing dates: 22 September 2016 Date of orders: 22 September 2016 Decision date: 22 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Gibson DCJ Decision: (1) The plaintiff is awarded interest on costs at 3% from 12 March 2014, making a total of $6,264 and increasing the judgment sum to $156,264. (2) The defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of these proceedings on an indemnity basis pursuant to s 40(2)(a) of the Defamation Act 2005 (NSW). (3) The plaintiff is entitled to an order for interest on those costs at the prescribed rate pursuant to s 101 of the Civil Procedure Act 2005. Catchwords: TORT – defamation – judgment for plaintiff for $150,000 – applications for interest on judgment, indemnity costs and interest on costs – no issue of principle Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) ss 21, 100, 101 Courts and Other Justice Portfolio Legislation Amendment Act 2015 (NSW) Defamation Act 2005 (NSW) s 40 Cases Cited: Cerrutti v Crestside Pty Ltd [2016] 1 Qd R 89 Davis v Nationwide News [2008] NSWSC 946 Doppstadt Australia v Lovick & Son Developments [2014] NSWCA 158 Grattan v Porter [2016] QDC 202 John Fairfax & Sons v Kelly (1987) 8 NSWLR 131 Leichhardt Municipal Council v Green [2004] NSWCA 341 MBP (SA) Ltd v Gogic (1991) 171 CLR 657 McGaw v Channel Seven Sydney [2006] NSWSC 1270 Polias v Ryan (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1 Rothe v Scott (No. 4) [2016] NSWDC 160 Texts Cited: - Category: Costs Parties: Plaintiff: Kenneth Rothe Defendant: David Scott Representation: Counsel: Plaintiff: Mr C J Dibb Defendant: Mr D Scott (in person)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate