NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: ING Bank Australia Ltd v Bucknell (No. 2) [2016] NSWSC 1356 Hearing dates: 23 September 2016 Date of orders: 23 September 2016 Decision date: 23 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Davies J Decision: 1. Judgment for the Plaintiff for possession of the whole of the land comprised in folio identifier 724/1075905, being the land situated at and known as 57 Jackey Drive, Camden Park in the State of New South Wales.
2. Judgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of $890,265.33.
3. The Defendants are to pay the Plaintiff's costs.
4. Leave to the Plaintiff to issue a writ of possession such writ not to be executed before 30 November 2016. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY – possession of land – mortgages – default – whether default occurred - whether estoppel prevents mortgagee from enforcing mortgage – when detriment alleged – withdrawal of representation before detriment occurred – no reliance on representation – default established – mortgagee entitled to possession Legislation Cited: Real Property Act 1900 (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) 1964 112 CLR 12 ING Bank Australia Ltd v Bucknell [2016] NSWSC 1049 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: ING Bank Australia Ltd (Plaintiff) Grant Andrew Bucknell (First Defendant) Sandra Bucknell (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: H Van Ravels (Plaintiff) S Brennan (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate