NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kohari v NSW Trustee & Guardian [2016] NSWSC 1372 Hearing dates: 21 September 2016 Date of orders: 21 September 2016 Decision date: 30 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Hallen J Decision: Orders made in Paragraph 54 Catchwords: SUCCESSION - FAMILY PROVISION – PARENTAGE TESTING - The Plaintiff, a person said to be the son of the deceased, applied for a family provision order under s 57(1)(c) of the Succession Act 2006 — Issue as to paternity - Defendant sought parentage testing under s 26 of the Status of Children Act 1996— Discretionary considerations - Power to order tests on family members - DNA test ordered. Legislation Cited: Births Deaths and Marriages Registration Act 1995 (NSW) Status of Children Act 1996 (NSW) Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Attorney General in and for the State of New South Wales; ex parte Thomas Hollins [2016] NSWSC 622 AW v CW (2002) 54 NSWLR 445 Brianna v Brianna (2010) 43 Fam LR 309; [2010] FamCAFC 97 D v Munday [2005] NSWSC 207 E v H (1986) 7 NSWLR 212 Furesh v Schor [2013] WASCA 231 G v H [1993] FamCA 39; (1993) 16 FamLR 525 G v H (1994) 181 CLR 387; [1994] HCA 48 Govers v Luff, (Supreme Crt, 5 November 1997, unrep) In re H (A Minor) (Blood Tests: Parental Rights) [1997] Fam 89 Kohari v Snow [2013] NSWSC 452 McCann v McCann [2011] NSWSC 1544 Piggott v Harrex [2000] TASSC 72 Russell v Russell [1924] AC 687 S v McC; W v W [1972] AC 24 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Mr Robert Kohari (Plaintiff) NSW Trustee and Guardian (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr M Thompson (Plaintiff) Mr D Stewart (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate