NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Edward Moses Obeid Snr -v- David Andrew Ipp [2016] NSWSC 1376 Hearing dates: 2, 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, 15, 16, 17 August 2016 Decision date: 27 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Hammerschlag J Decision: Plaintiffs' claims dismissed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW — STATUTES — Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 (NSW) ("the Act") — inquiry into allegations of corruption — requirement to provide procedural fairness to potentially affected persons — claim by the plaintiffs for declaratory relief that they were denied procedural fairness by reason of the non-disclosure of a number of specified matters — HELD: denial of procedural fairness not established — the plaintiffs had an adequate opportunity to deal with the relevant subject matter — the plaintiffs were not deprived of the possibility of a successful outcome.
TORT — Misfeasance in public office — requirements for liability — whether defendants held public office — whether they knowingly or recklessly exceeded powers — whether they were reckless as to whether plaintiffs would suffer damage — whether plaintiffs suffered damage — CLAIM that ICAC committed misfeasance by knowingly denying procedural fairness — HELD: plaintiffs not denied procedural fairness — damage not established — CLAIM that Commissioner committed misfeasance in public office by making a suppression order which he knew he had no power to make — HELD: not established that the Commissioner had no power — not established that the Commissioner knew he had no power — no damage established — CLAIM that Counsel Assisting committed misfeasance in public office by cross-examining on a knowingly false premise — HELD: Counsel Assisting did not occupy public office — existence of false premise not established — no damage established — Counsel Assisting entitled to barristers' immunity — CLAIM that ICAC investigators who executed search warrant committed misfeasance in public office by causing videotaping of documents outside search warrant — HELD: investigators executing search warrant did not hold public office — held they did knowingly engage in conduct beyond power — knowledge or recklessness of damage to be suffered not established — no damage established. Legislation Cited: Barristers Rules 2011 (NSW) Independent Commission Against Corruption Act 1988 (NSW) Legal Profession Uniform Law (NSW) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Victorian Police Regulation Act 1958 (Vic) Cases Cited: Applicant VEAL of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 225 CLR 88 Attwells v Jackson Lalic Lawyers Pty Ltd (2016) 331 ALR 1 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Radio Rentals Ltd (2005) 146 FCR 292 Australian Special Opportunity Fund LP v Equity Trustees Wealth Services Ltd (2015) 323 ALR 570 Brambles Holdings Ltd v Carey (1976) 15 SASR 270 Cannon v Tahche (2002) 5 VR 317 Chappel v Hart (1998) 195 CLR 232 Commissioner for Australian Capital Territory Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 576 Cornwall v Rowan (2004) 90 SASR 269 Duncan v Independent Commission Against Corruption [2016] NSWCA 143 Dunlop v Woollahra Municipal Council [1981] 1 NSWLR 76 Elguzouli-Daf v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [1995] QB 335 Ellis v Wallsend District Hospital (1989) 17 NSWLR 553 Ex parte Aala (2000) 204 CLR 82 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Futuris Corporation Ltd (2008) 237 CLR 146 Fish & Fish Ltd v Sea Shepherd UK [2015] AC 1229 Frank Davies Pty Ltd v Container Haulage Group Pty Ltd (No 2) (1989) 98 FLR 324 Glynn v Independent Commission Against Corruption (1990) 20 ALD 214 Gondarra v Minister for Families, Housing, Community Services and Indigenous Affairs (2014) 220 FCR 202 Hart v Commissioner of Australian Federal Police (2002) 124 FCR 384 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298 Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550 Krakowski v Eurolynx Properties Ltd (1995) 183 CLR 563 Leerdam v Noori (2009) 227 FLR 210 Macquarie Bank Ltd v Sixty-Fourth Throne Pty Ltd [1998] 3 VR 133 March v E & MH Stramare Pty Ltd (1991) 171 CLR 506 Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZSSJ [2016] HCA 29 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs, Re; Ex parte Applicants S134/2002 (2003) 211 CLR 441 Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs, Re; Ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1 Moder v Commonwealth of Australia (2012) 261 FLR 396 Northern Territory v Mengel (1995) 185 CLR 307 Penfolds Wines Pty Ltd v Elliott (1946) 74 CLR 204 Porter v OAMPS Ltd (2005) 215 ALR 327 Poynder v Kent [2008] VSCA 245 Rosenberg v Percival (2001) 205 CLR 434 Ruddock v Taylor (2005) 222 CLR 612 Sanders v Snell (1998) 196 CLR 329 Shields v Overland (2009) 26 VR 303 Slaveski v Victoria [2010] VSC 441 South Australia v Lampard Trevorrow (2010) 106 SASR 331 Stead v SGIO (1986) 161 CLR 141 SZBEL v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2006) 228 CLR 152 Tampion v Anderson (No 2) [1973] VR 715 Three Rivers District Council v Governor and Company of the Bank of England (No 3) [2003] 2 AC 1 WZARH v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2015) 90 ALJR 25 Texts Cited: C Sappideen and P Vines, Fleming's The Law of Torts (10th ed, 2011, Thompson Reuters) R P Balkin and J L R Davis, Law of Torts (5th ed, 2013, Lexis Nexis) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Edward Moses Obeid Snr - First Plaintiff Moses Edward Obeid - Second Plaintiff Paul Edward Obeid - Third Plaintiff Edward Joseph Obeid Jnr - Fourth Plaintiff David Andrew Ipp - First Defendant Geoffrey Maurice Watson - Second Defendant Grant Lockley - Third Defendant Paul Anthony Grainger - Fourth Defendant The Independent Commission Against Corruption - Seventh Defendant Representation: Counsel: C R C Newlinds SC with D R Sulan and A J O'Brien - Plaintiffs B Walker SC with S Free and P Herzfeld - First Defendant D A McLure SC with P G Sharp - Second Defendant P Braham SC with R Scruby - Third Defendant E Cheeseman SC with J Hutton and Ms S Patterson - Fourth Defendant J K Kirk SC with A M Mitchelmore and C G Winnett - Seventh Defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate