NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v RMW [2016] NSWCCA 211 Hearing dates: 22 August 2016 Date of orders: 05 October 2016 Decision date: 05 October 2016 Before: Hoeben CJ at CL at [1] Davies J at [2] Bellew J at [3] Decision: 1. The Crown appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Sentence – Crown appeal against inadequacy – Where respondent pleaded guilty to charges of administering poison and assault - Where the victim of the offending was the respondent's 9 year old child –Where sentencing judge imposed terms of imprisonment to be served by way of an intensive corrections order – Where all grounds of appeal asserting error on the part of the sentencing judge were established – Where sentence imposed was found to be manifestly inadequate – Where court took into account the rehabilitation undergone by the respondent since being sentenced and the re-establishment of a relationship with her children – Residual discretion exercised – Crown appeal against inadequacy dismissed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Poisons and Therapeutic Goods Act 1966 (NSW) Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) Cases Cited: Cahyadi v R [2007] NSWCCA 1; (2007) 168 A Crim R 41 CMB v Attorney-General for New South Wales [2015] HCA 9; 317 ALR 2308 Franklin v R [2013] NSWCCA 122 Mulato v R [2006] NSWCCA 282 R v Mills [2005] NSWCCA 175; (2005) 154 A Crim R 40 RCW v R (No 2) [2014] NSWCCA 190; (2014) 244 A Crim R 541 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Crown – Appellant RMW – Respondent Representation: Counsel: Ms B Baker – Appellant Mr P D Rosser QC – Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate