NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Barakat (No 8) [2016] NSWSC 1382 Hearing dates: 27 September 2016 Decision date: 29 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: N Adams J Decision: The application for a verdict by direction is refused. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – shooting murder – application by accused for verdict by direction Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(1) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 136 Cases Cited: Attorney-General's Reference (No 1 of 1983) [1983] 2 VR 410 Dicianna v R; Pintabona v R [2015] NSWCCA 201 Doney v R (1990) 171 CLR 207; [1990] HCA 51 JMR (1991) 57 A Crim R 39 R v Bilick and Starke (1984) 36 SASR 322; 11 A Crim R 452 R v Josephine Pintabona (unreported, NSWSC, 28 May 2013) Regina v PL [2012] NSWCCA 31 R v R (1989) 18 NSWLR 74 R v Tang [2006] NSWCCA 167 R v XHR [2012] NSWCCA 247 Shepherd v The Queen (1990) 170 CLR 573 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Mahmoud Barakat Representation: Counsel: P McGrath SC (Crown) D Dalton SC (Accused Barakat)
Solicitors: Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Crown) Kiki Kyriacou Lawyers (Accused Barakat) File Number(s): 2013/00327619 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate