NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Walker v R [2016] NSWCCA 213 Hearing dates: 26 September 2016 Decision date: 05 October 2016 Before: Gleeson JA at [1]; Harrison J at [67]; Campbell J at [68] Decision: 1 Grant leave to appeal against sentence. 2 Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 5 – whether imprisonment only appropriate penalty – where applicant entered guilty plea in 2004 to charge of maliciously inflicting grievous bodily harm – s 35(b) Crimes Act 1900 – maximum penalty 7 years imprisonment – unprovoked punch to victim requiring jaw reconstruction – where applicant failed to appear on sentence and warrant issued – where applicant apprehended by chance in 2015 and sentenced to 2 years imprisonment with 12 month non-parole period – whether primary judge considered alternatives to full-time custodial sentence – where finding by primary judge that full-time custodial sentence only appropriate option – whether primary judge considered applicant's rehabilitation during delay in sentencing – distinction between delay arising from circumstances outside offender's control and delay caused by offender – whether full-time custodial sentence manifestly excessive or unjust – objective seriousness of offence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) s 35 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) s 5 Cases Cited: Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54; 202 CLR 321 Douar v R [2005] NSWCCA 455 Fedele v R [2015] NSWCCA 286 Hili v The Queen (2010) 242 CLR 520; [2010] HCA 45 House v The King [1936] HCA 40; 55 CLR 499 Lambert v R [2015] NSWCCA 22 Lowndes v The Queen (1999) 195 CLR 665; [1999] HCA 29 Markarian v The Queen (2005) 228 CLR 357; [2005] HCA 25 Papworth v R [2011] NSWCCA 253 R v Foster (2001) 33 MVR 565; [2001] NSWCCA 215 R v JCE (2000)] 120 A Crim R 18; NSWCCA 498 R v Morgan (1993) 70 A Crim R 368 R v Pogson; R v Lapham; R v Martin (2012) 82 NSWLR 60; [2012] NSWCCA 225 R v Reeves [2002] NSWCCA 33 R v Shore (1992) 66 A Crim R 37 R v Todd (1982) 2 NSWLR 517 R v Wegener [1999] NSWCCA 405 R v Zamagias [2002] NSWCCA 17 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584; [2001] HCA 64 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gary Todd Walker (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Wendler (Applicant) N Williams (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate