NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Sitki v Sitki; Sitki v Aksoy [2016] NSWSC 1396 Hearing dates: 22 and 23 September 2016 Decision date: 30 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Family Provision List Before: Stevenson J Decision: Further provision to be made for widow; claim for provision by adult daughter to be dismissed Catchwords: SUCCESSION – FAMILY PROVISION – claim for provision by widow – widow given only life interest in properties – lengthy and happy marriage – common ground such provision not adequate – what further provision should be made – claim for provision by adult daughter from earlier marriage – whether daughter has shown that provision from will of interest in properties in Cyprus as affected by Cypriot/Turkish law not adequate Legislation Cited: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Family Provision Act 1982 (NSW) Property (Relationships) Act 1984 (NSW) Succession Act 2006 (NSW) Cases Cited: Andrew v Andrew (2012) 81 NSWLR 656; NSWCA 308 Bladwell v Davis [2004] NSWCA 170 Ciric v Ciric [2015] NSWSC 313 Cross v Wasson [2009] NSWSC 378 Epov v Epov; Epov v Epov [2014] NSWSC 1086 Friend v Brien [2014] NSWSC 613 Gersbach v Blake [2011] NSWSC 368 Gorton v Parks (1989) 17 NSWLR 1 Graham v Graham [2011] NSWSC 504 Hedman v Frazer; Egan v Frazer [2013] NSWSC 1915 Keep v Bourke [2012] NSWCA 64 Lajcarova v Todorov [2011] NSWSC 522 Luciano v Rosenblum (1985) 2 NSWLR 65 Manuel v Lane [2013] NSWCA 61 McKenzie v Topp [2004] VSC 90 Nowak v Beska [2013] NSWSC 166 Phillips v James (2014) 85 NSWLR 619; NSWCA 4 Pontifical Society for the Propagation of the Faith v Scales (1962) 107 CLR 9; HCA 19 Salmon v Osmond [2015] NSWCA 42 Singer v Berghouse (No 2) (1994) 181 CLR 201; HCA 40 Verzar v Verzar [2014] NSWCA 45 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Hatice Sitki (Plaintiff/Second Cross-Defendant) Binnaz Sitki (First Defendant/Cross-Claimant) Ilay Aksoy (Second Defendant/First Cross-Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D Blackah (Plaintiff/Second Cross-Defendant) L Ellison SC with S L Warren (First Defendant/Cross-Claimant) G J Smith (Second Defendant/First Cross-Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate