NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Agarwal v Bagga [2016] NSWSC 1402 Hearing dates: 27 September 2016 Date of orders: 27 September 2016 Decision date: 27 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: McDougall J Decision: Proceedings cross-vested to Family Court of Australia. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application to stay or decline to exercise jurisdiction to hear, or to dismiss summarily, proceedings – whether Court of its own motion should transfer proceedings to the Family Court of Australia – whether the Family Court is the more appropriate forum – whether it is in the interests of justice to do so – Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-vesting) Act 1987 (NSW) Legislation Cited: Family Law Act 1975 (Cth) Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (NSW) Jurisdiction of Courts (Cross-Vesting) Act 1987 (Cth) Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: BHP Billiton Ltd v Schultz (2004) 221 CLR 400 Kolback Securities Ltd v Epoch Mining NL (1987) 8 NSWLR 533 In the marriage of HT and NI Kowalski (1992) 16 Fam LR 235 Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally (1999) 198 CLR 511 Young v Lalic [2006] NSWSC 18 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Lily Agarwal (Plaintiff) Sumeet Bagga (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Lily Agarwal (Plaintiff) (In person) G Stapleton (Defendant)
Solicitors: Armstrong Legal (Defendant) File Number(s): 2016/173151
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate