NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Qaumi & Ors (No 66) [2016] NSWSC 1403 Hearing dates: 26-27 September 2016 Date of orders: 28 September 2016 Decision date: 04 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Before: Hamill J Decision: Jury provided with transcripts of addresses and summing up. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – jury request for transcripts of addresses and summing up – no provision in Jury Act – discretion to provide – long and complex trial – careful and thorough addresses – where summing up canvassed many legal issues – discretion exercised to comply with jury request Legislation Cited: Jury Act 1977 (NSW) Cases Cited: R v Bartle & Ors [2003] NSWCCA 329 R v Sukkar [2005] NSWCCA 54 R v Taousanis [1999] NSWSC 107 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Regina Farhad Qaumi Mumtaz Qaumi Jamil Qaumi Mohammad Zarshoy Mohammed Kalal Representation: Counsel: K McKay & P Hogan (Crown) J Stratton SC & M Curry (F Qaumi) P Young SC (M Quami) N Carroll (J Quami) R Driels (M Zarshoy) G Clarke (M Kalal)
Solicitors: Solicitor for the NSW DPP(Crown) Archbold Legal (F Qaumi) George Sten & Co (M Quami) Bannisters Lawyers (J Quami) Zahr Lawyers (M Zarshoy) Hallak Law (M Kalal) File Number(s): Farhad Quami - 2014/6809; 2014/315201; 2014/315252Mumtaz Quami – 2014/6813; 2014/315251; 2014/315260Jamil Quami - 2013/336086; 2014/18164; 2014315253Mohammad Zarshoy – 2014/316236Mohammed Kalal - 2013/344739; 2014/66939 Publication restriction: No publication until the conclusion of the trial.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate