NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Bettar v Council of the City of Sydney [2016] NSWLEC 1456 Hearing dates: 12-13 September 2016 Date of orders: 04 October 2016 Decision date: 04 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Class 1 Before: O'Neill C Decision: 1. The appeal is upheld. 2. In accordance with section 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Applicant is to pay the Respondent's costs thrown away as a result of the amendments made to the proposal in exhibit J, as agreed or assessed, within 28 days. 3. Development Application No. D/2015/1829 for a residential flat building consisting of seven storeys and basement parking at 17-19 Dunning Avenue, Rosebery is approved, subject to the conditions of consent at Annexure 'A'. 4. The exhibits, other than exhibits 1, J and L, are returned. Catchwords: DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION: residential flat building; primary building setback; flexible use of ground and first floor levels in a mixed use zone; number of storeys; internal amenity; whether amendments made to the proposal are minor for the purpose of section 97B of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979. Legislation Cited: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 Cases Cited: Futurespace Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council (2009) 169 LGERA 153 Al Maha Pty Ltd v Marrickville Council [2013] NSWLEC 1072 Arnott v City of Sydney Council [2015] NSWLEC 1052 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Paul Bettar (Applicant) Council of the City of Sydney (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr A. Galasso SC (Applicant) Mr I. Hemmings SC (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate