Roberts v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2016] NSWCATAD 218

Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Roberts v Commissioner for Fair Trading [2016] NSWCATAD 218 Hearing dates: 11 April 2016 Date of orders: 05 October 2016 Decision date: 05 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: S Montgomery, Senior Member Decision: The decision under review is affirmed Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW - tattoo parlours – tattoo operator licence - adverse security determination - fit and proper person - public interest Legislation Cited: Tattoo Parlours Act 2012 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Cases Cited: ACT Revenue v Alphaone Pty Ltd (1994) 49 FCR 589 Austin v Commissioner of Fair Trading & Commissioner of Police [2016] NSWCATAP 179 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond [1990] HCA 33; (1990) 170 CLR 321 Dyas v Director-General Fair Trading & Commissioner Of Police [2014] NSWCATAD 223 Hughes and Vale Pty Ltd v New South Wales (No. 2) [1955] HCA 28; (1955) 93 CLR 127 Smith v Commissioner of Police & Anor [2014] NSWACTAD 184 Sobey v Commercial and Private Agents Board (1979) 22 SASR 70 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Stephen Matthew Roberts (Applicant) Commissioner for Fair Trading (First Respondent) Commissioner of Police, NSW Police Force (Second Respondent) Representation: Counsel: H El Hage (Respondents)

Solicitors: J Maspero (Applicant) Crown Solicitors Office (Respondents) File Number(s): 1610057 Publication restriction: Section 64 of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 applies to those paragraphs of these reasons identified as [NOT FOR PUBLICATION]. Those paragraphs are not to be released to the Appellant, his legal representatives or to the public.