NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Office of the Children's Guardian v CFW [2016] NSWSC 1406 Hearing dates: 15 September 2016 Date of orders: 05 October 2016 Decision date: 05 October 2016 Before: Harrison J Decision: (1) Set aside the orders made by the New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal on 20 April 2016 in CFW v Children's Guardian [2016] NSWCATAD 76.
(2) Remit the proceedings to the Tribunal, differently constituted, to be dealt with according to law. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – judicial review – appeal from decision of New South Wales Civil and Administrative Tribunal – Working with Children clearance – whether Tribunal misapplied the statutory test in s 18(2) of the Child Protection (Working with Children) Act – whether Tribunal failed to take into account mandatory relevant considerations – possibility defendant had engaged in relevant criminal or inappropriate conduct – possibility the defendant had intentionally sought out child pornography – whether failure to take into account could have materially affected the decision Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Crimes Act 1900 Cases Cited: BKE v Office of Children's Guardian [2015] NSWSC 523 BSR v Office of the Children's Guardian [2015] NSWCATAD 264 CFW v Children's Guardian [2016] NSWCATAD 76 Chief Executive Officer, Department for Child Protection v Grindrod (No 2) [2008] WASCA 28 Commission for Children and Young People v V [2002] NSWSC 949 M v M (1988) 166 CLR 69; [1988] HCA 68 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24; [1986] HCA 40 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZJSS (2010) 243 CLR 164; [2010] HCA 48 Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Wu Shan Liang (1996) 185 CLR 259; [1996] HCA 6 Warkworth Mining Limited v Bulga Milbrodale Progress Association Inc (2014) 86 NSLWR 527; [2014] NSWCA 105 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Office of the Children's Guardian (Plaintiff) CFW (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: C Lenehan (Plaintiff)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate