NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Wiskich v Composite Materials Australia Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAP 221 Hearing dates: 24 April 2016, respondent's application for leave to reopen 18 August 2016 Date of orders: 06 October 2016 Decision date: 06 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Appeal Panel Before: Cowdroy ADCJ, Principal Member J Wakefield, Senior Member Decision: (1) That the respondent's application for leave to reopen its case on appeal is refused. (2) That the Appeal from the orders made on 25 November 2015 in proceedings 15/35105 be upheld. (3) That the amount of $15,000 as set out in the money order made in proceedings 15/35105 be varied by the substitution of the amount of $40,000 in lieu of $15,000. (4) That the amount of $40,000 is to be paid by the respondent to the appellant within 28 days of the date of this order. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NSW) – jurisdiction – error of law - "irrational" or "unreasonable" – other grounds – leave to appeal – general principles – variation of money order – application for leave to reopen Legislation Cited: Australian Consumer Law 2010 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (No 2) (NSW) Consumer Claims Act 1998 (NSW) Fair Trading Act 1987 (NSW) Cases Cited: Aon Risk Services Australia Ltd v Australian National University (2009) 239 CLR 175 ASIC v Rich [2006] NSWSC 826 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v Wednesbury Corporation [1948] 1 KB 223 Chao v Chao (No 2) [2008] NSWSC 612 Collins v Urban [2014] NSWCATAP 17 House v The Queen (1936) 55 CLR 499 Lam v Steve Jarvin Motors Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATAP 186 Lloyd v McMahon [1987] AC 625 Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Limited (1986) 162 CLR 24 Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS (2010) 240 CLR 611 N M Rural Enterprises Pty Ltd v Rimanui Farms Ltd [2012] NSWSC 31 Taouk v Louis (No. 1) [2014] NSWSC 656 The Owners – Strata Plan No 74602 v Brookfield Australia Investments Ltd [2015] NSWSC 1682 Texts Cited: Halsbury's Laws of England (5th ed, 2010) Vol 77 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Gail Wiskich (Appellant) Composite Materials Australia Pty Ltd (Respondent) Representation: Solicitors: Ashley Smith & Partners (Rppellant) Eamon Hurley (Director) (Respondent by telephone on 18 August 2016) File Number(s): AP15/68538 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Date of Decision: 25 November 2015 Before: P Smith, General Member File Number(s): GEN15/35105
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate