NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CGZ v Children's Guardian [2016] NSWCATAD 220 Hearing dates: 8 June 2016 Date of orders: 06 October 2016 Decision date: 06 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: M Hitter, Senior Member B Field, General Member Decision: The decision of the Respondent to refuse a Working with Children Clearance is affirmed. Catchwords: ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – whether the applicant poses a risk to the safety of children – assessment of risk Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 (NSW) Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 (NSW) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 (NSW) Evidence Act 1995 NSW Cases Cited: AYU v NSW Office of the Children's Guardian [2014] NSWCATAD 69 BFC v The Children's Guardian [2014] NSWCATAD 90 BFX v Children's Guardian [2014] NSWCATAD 115 BJB v NSW Office of the Children's Guardian (no 2) 2014 NSWCAT 164 BKE v Office of Children's Guardian & Anor [2015] NSWSC 523 BQE v Children's Guardian [2015] NSWCATAD 89 CJT v Office of Children's Guardian [2016] NSWSC 738 Commissioner for Children and Young People v IK [2005] NSWSC 1136 Commission for Children and Young People v FZ NSWCA 111 Commissioner for Children and Young People v V [2002] NSWSC 949 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CGZ (Applicant) Children's Guardian (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: V Hartstein (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate