NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Bonafair Holdings Pty Ltd v Hungry Jack's Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCA 276 Hearing dates: 15 August 2016 Decision date: 06 October 2016 Before: McColl JA at [1] Meagher JA at [2] Sackville AJA at [3] Decision: 1. Appeal dismissed. 2. Cross-appeal dismissed. 3. No order as to the costs of the appeal and cross-appeal. Catchwords: LANDLORD AND TENANT – construction of lease – whether lessee obliged to pay the cost of replacing the main electrical switchboard (MSB) servicing the leasehold premises – whether lessee liable for deterioration of MSB during the period preceding commencement of the lease LANDLORD AND TENANT – lessee covenants to pay "land tax assessed on a single holding basis" – leasehold premises held in a "special trust" – lessor not entitled to take advantage of tax free threshold usually available – whether lessor entitled to recover from lessee actual amount of land tax paid in respect of the premises LANDLORD AND TENANT – covenant to repair – whether primary Judge erred in finding that repairs to the premises were required by reason of "reasonable wear and tear" Legislation Cited: Land Tax Act 1956 (NSW), s 3AL Land Tax Management Act 1956 (NSW), s 3A Occupational Health and Safety Act 2000 (NSW), s 8 Retail Leases Act 1994 (NSW), s 26(1)(b), s 7 Cases Cited: Alamdo Holdings Pty Ltd v Australian Window Furnishings (NSW) Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 224; [2007] NSW ConvR 56-167 Bonafair Holdings Pty Ltd v Hungry Jack's Pty Ltd, unrep, 10 November 2015, District Court (Curtis DCJ) Commercial Union Assurance Company of Australia Ltd v Ferrcom Pty Ltd (1991) 22 NSWLR 389 Haskell v Marlow [1928] 2 KB 45 Ho v Powell (2001) 51 NSWLR 572; [2001] NSWCA 168 Jones v Dunkel (1959) 101 CLR 298; [1959] HCA 8 Regis Property Co Ltd v Dudley [1959] AC 370 Tooth & Co Ltd v Newcastle Developments Ltd (1966) 116 CLR 167; [1966] HCA 57 Water Board v Moustakas (1988) 180 CLR 491; [1988] HCA 12 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bonafair Holdings Pty Limited (Appellant/Cross Respondent) Hungry Jack's Pty Limited (Respondent/Cross-Appellant) Representation: Counsel: Mr S A Bogan (Appellant/Cross Respondent) Mr C E Bannan (Respondent/Cross-Appellant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate