NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: R v Bragias [2016] NSWCCA 219 Hearing dates: 24 April 2016 Decision date: 07 October 2016 Before: McCallum J at [1] R A Hulme J at [69] Schmidt J at [70] Decision: Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – conviction appeal – offence of taking a motor vehicle with assault – whether verdict was unreasonable, or cannot be supported, having regard to the evidence – where complainant admitted lying to police – assessment of coherence of his account – consideration of jury's advantage in hearing the evidence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), ss 98, 154C(2) Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW), s 6(1) Evidence Act 1995 (NSW), s 60 Cases Cited: Chamberlain v The Queen (No 2) (1984) 153 CLR 521; [1984] HCA 7 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487; [1994] HCA 63 Morris v The Queen (1987) 163 CLR 454; [1987] HCA 50 Rattan v The Queen (1974) 131 CLR 510; [1974] HCA 35 SKA v The Queen (2011) 243 CLR 400; [2011] HCA 1 Whitehorn v The Queen (1983) 152 CLR 657; [1983] HCA 42 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Harrison Bragias (applicant) Regina (respondent) Representation: Counsel: S Healey (applicant) N J Adams (respondent)
Solicitors: Russell Byrnes Solicitors (applicant) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (respondent) File Number(s): 2013/34409 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 2 April 2015 Before: McClintock SC DCJ File Number(s): 2013/34409
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate