NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Staunton v Lotus Construction Pty Ltd [2016] NSWCATCD 64 Hearing dates: 10 December 2015, 27 January 2015 and 14 April 2015 (close of submissions – 27 May 2016) Decision date: 12 July 2016 Jurisdiction: Consumer and Commercial Division Before: K Rosser, Senior Member Decision: (1) A further hearing is dispensed with pursuant to s 50(1)(c) of the Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013
(2) The respondent is to pay the applicants the sum of $20,930.80 immediately.
(3) Order 2 is stayed until the applicants make restitution to the respondent of the sum of $20,930.80 paid to them by the respondent in compliance with the money order made by the Tribunal on 2 April 2014, which order was set aside by the Appeal Panel on 29 July 2015. Catchwords: Home Building – remitted proceedings – crystallisation of loss - effect of sale of premises on entitlement to damages – quantum of loss – stay of money order pending restitution Legislation Cited: Home Building Act 1989 Consumer Trader and Tenancy Tribunal Act 2001 Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Cases Cited: Bellgrove v Eldridge 90 CLR 613 Ruxley Electronics & Construction v Forsyth [1995] 3 WLR 118 Westpoint Management Ltd v Chocolate Factory Apartments Ltd; Chocolate Factory Apartments v Westpoint Finance & Ors [2007] NSWCA 253 Director of War Service Homes v Harris [1968] Qd R 275 (FC) Central Coast Leagues Club Limited v Gosford City Council & Ors BC9802257 Howe v Teefy [1927] NSWStRp 41; (1927) 27 SR (NSW) 301 (1 July 1927) Landy v Benteigh Homes Illawarra [2011] NSWCTTT Production Spray Painting and Panel Beating Pty Limited & Os v Newnham & Ors [No 2] (1991) 27 NSWLR 659 TCN Channel Nine Pty Limited v Antoniadis [No 2] (1998) 44 NSWLR 682 Hume v Walton (No 2) [2005] NSWCA 458 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Mark and Bernadette Staunton (Applicants) Lotus Construction Pty Ltd (Respondents) Representation: Counsel: Ms Sinclair for Applicants Mr Snelgrove for Respondent Solicitors: George Khoury & Co for Applicants Snelgroves Solicitors for Respondent File Number(s): HB 13/56853 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate