NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v James Henry Kinch [2016] NSWSC 1424 Hearing dates: 5 October 2016 Date of orders: 06 October 2016 Decision date: 07 October 2016 Before: Hall J Decision: Pursuant to s 95 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) (the Act), the items set out in Schedule 1 to 6 in the Notice of Motion filed on 17 August 2016 are forfeited under Part 2-3 of the Act. The question of costs is reserved. Catchwords: PROCEEDS OF CRIME – Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 – Forfeiture on conviction of a serious offence – automatic forfeiture provisions (s 92 of the Act) – forfeiture at end of six month period starting on conviction day or the extended period – application for extension order made day prior to expiration of six month period – no extension order made prior to expiration of the six month period – property subject to a forfeiture order was forfeited as expiration of the six month period – s 94(2) of the Act – application for extension order and exclusion order dismissed Legislation Cited: Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) Cases Cited: ASIC v Marlborough Gold Mines Ltd (1993) 177 CLR 485 at 492; HCA 13 Australian Broadcasting Commission v Australasian Performing Right Association Ltd (1973) 129 CLR 99; HCA 36 Coco v the Queen (1994) 179 CLR 427; HCA 15 Commissioner for Railways (NSW) v Agalianos (1955) 92 CLR 390; HCA 27 Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Hart and Ors [2016] QCA 215 Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Nguyen [2016] NSWSC 883 DPP v Alex Chan [2001] NSWCA 249 Gett v Tabet (2009) 254 ALR 504; NSWCA 76 Hall v Director of Public Prosecutions [2015] SASCFC 19 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355 The Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police v Halac [2015] NSWSC 520 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (Applicant) James Henry Kinch (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr D Tynan (Applicant) Ms S Goodwin (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate