NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Dangerfield [2016] NSWCA 277 Hearing dates: 12 September 2016 Decision date: 11 October 2016 Before: Beazley ACJ at [1] Gleeson JA at [2] Payne JA at [94] Decision: 1. Direct the appellant to file a notice of appeal in the form contained in the White Book within 7 days.
2. Appeal dismissed.
3. Appellant to pay the respondent's costs in this Court. Catchwords: PRODEDURE – contempt, attachment and sequestration – power of Local Court to refer matter of contempt to Supreme Court for determination – Local Court Act 2007 s 24(4) – Supreme Court Rules Pt 55 – where respondent refused to answer questions as prosecution witness in Local Court trial of her brother for domestic violence-related assault – where appearance to Local Court that respondent guilty of contempt – where Local Court referred matter to Supreme Court – appeal from Supreme Court's dismissal of summons for contempt
PROCEDURAL FAIRNESS – contempt – where primary judge found respondent denied procedural fairness by Local Court when exercising referral power – where respondent not informed by magistrate of different courses of action available to Local Court to deal with contempt – where respondent not invited to make submissions on whether magistrate should refer matter or determine summarily – whether implication of common law natural justice principles in s 24(4) – whether observance of procedural fairness attaches as condition of exercise of 'ministerial' power – nature of referral power and effect on respondent's rights and interests – whether increase in extent respondent's interests jeopardized – where different maximum penalties for contempt punishable in Local Court and Supreme Court – where prejudice in the form of hardship to respondent as Indigenous woman residing in Queensland with children if required to answer contempt charge in Supreme Court Legislation Cited: Acts Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) s 68(3) s 112 Administrative Decisions Tribunal Act 1997 (NSW) s 112 District Court Act 1973 (NSW) ss 199, 203 Legal Practitioners Act 1898 (NSW) ss 71, 72 Legal Profession Act 1987 (NSW) s 155 Local Court Act 2007 (NSW) s 24 Local Courts Act 1982 (NSW) s 27B Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) s 101 Supreme Court Rules 1970 (NSW) Pt 55 r 3, 7, 8, 9, 11 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW) r 42.1 Cases Cited: Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564; [1992] HCA 10 Annetts v McCann (1990) 170 CLR 596; [1990] HCA 57 Attorney-General (Cth) v Oates (1999) 198 CLR 162 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Plymin (No 3) (2002) 170 FLR 128; [2002] VSC 358 Baba v Parole Board of NSW (1986) 5 NSWLR 338 Commissioner of Police v Reid (1989) 16 NSWLR 453 Cornall v AB [1995] 1 VR 372 Dennis v Law Society of NSW (Court of Appeal, 17 December 1979, unreported) Field v New South Wales Crime Commission [2009] NSWCA 144 Johnston v Nationwide News Pty Ltd (2005) 62 NSWLR 309; [2005] NSWCA 17 Killen v Lane (1983) 1 NSWLR 171 Kioa v West (1985) 159 CLR 550; [1985] HCA 81 Medical Board of Queensland v Byrne (1958) 100 CLR 582; [1958] HCA 40 Murray v Legal Services Commissioner (1999) 46 NSWLR 224; [1999] NSWCA 70 Oates v Attorney-General (Cth) (1998) 84 FCR 348 Potier v Director-General, Department of Justice & Attorney General [2011] NSWCA 105 Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales v Dangerfield [2015] NSWSC 1895 Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; Ex parte Lam (2003) 214 CLR 1; [2003] HCA 6 Registrar of Court of Appeal v Maniam (No 1) (1991) 25 NSWLR 459 Saeed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (2010) 241 CLR 252; [2010] HCA 23 South Australia v O'Shea (1987) 163 CLR 378; [1987] HCA 399 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Prothonotary of the Supreme Court of New South Wales (Appellant) Elizabeth Dangerfield (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: D T Kell (Appellant) G Bashir SC/ C O'Neill (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate