NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Cutajar v R [2016] NSWCCA 222 Hearing dates: 19 September 2016 Date of orders: 19 September 2016 Decision date: 19 September 2016 Before: Price J at [1], [23]; Button J at [2]; Fagan J at [3]. Decision: 1. Leave to appeal is granted. 2. The appeal is dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – aggregate sentence – offences against Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW), ss 25A(1), 25(1) – possession of prohibited weapon – rejection of evidence of offender by sentencing judge – whether adequate reasons
CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – whether manifest excess – comparable sentences Legislation Cited: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW) Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: Dang v R [2014] NSWCCA 47 Farkas v R [2014] NSWCCA 141; (2014) 243 A Crim R 388 Fayd'Herbe v R [2007] NSWCCA 20 R v Clark (Court of Criminal Appeal (NSW), 15 March 1990, unrep) Smaragdis v R [2010] NSWCCA 276 Soulemezis v Dudley (Holdings) Pty Ltd (1987) 10 NSWLR 247 R v Andrew Cutajar (District Court (NSW), 4 September 2015, unrep) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Andrew Cutajar (applicant) Regina (respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr Leslie Nicholls (applicant) Ms Belinda Baker (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate