NSW Caselaw
Court of Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Majak v Rose [2016] NSWCA 278 Hearing dates: 26 September 2016 Decision date: 12 October 2016 Before: Meagher JA Decision: 1. Notice of motion filed on 5 September 2016 dismissed. 2. Order the applicant pay the respondent's costs of that motion. 3. The proceedings be listed for directions before the Registrar at 9.00am 19 October 2016. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – where applicant seeks judicial review of costs orders and other decisions made in Local Court and District Court – where application for stay of enforcement of costs orders and of part heard application in Local Court for apprehended personal violence order – no arguable case for interim relief – application refused Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), s 338(1), (2) Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 (NSW), ss 9(2), 73, 84(2) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Zofia Majak (Applicant) Alan Wesley Rose (Third Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Z Majak (Applicant in person) A R Byrnes, Solicitor (Third Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/266890 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of New South Wales;Local Court of New South Wales Date of Decision: 7 June 2016; 10 December 2015; 22 June, 4 August 2016 Before: Bozic DCJ; Magistrate Lee; Magistrate Williams File Number(s): 2014/44950; 2016/34166
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate