NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Hughes v Fong [2016] NSWSC 1451 Hearing dates: 10 October 2016 Date of orders: 13 October 2016 Decision date: 13 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Campbell J Decision: (1) The second defendant's application to strike out the statement of claim as having been filed contrary to rule 6.19 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (2005) is dismissed; (2) Direct the parties to otherwise bring in short minutes of order giving effect to my reasons and for the future management of the proceedings; (3) I will hear counsel as to costs. Catchwords: PROCEDURE – adequacy of pleadings – multiple plaintiffs – whether joinder of 17 plaintiffs on the same statement of claim complies with the UPCR – where all parties in agreement that claims should travel together Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), ss 56, 157 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, s 90 High Court Rules 2004 (Cth), O.16, r 1 Practice Note SC Gen 17 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), rr 6.1, 14.28 Cases Cited: ASIC v Sommerville [2008] NSWSC 788 Belcastro v Gabriel Nakhl & Ors [2014] NSWSC 1305 Berowra Holdings Limited v Gordon (2006) 225 CLR 364; [2006] HCA 32 Bishop v Bridgelands Securities (1990) 25 FCR 311 Carter v Commissioner of Taxation (2001) 109 FCR 215 Cheque One Pty Ltd v Cheque Exchange (Australia) Pty Ltd (in liq) [2002] FCA 593 Dean-Willcocks v Air Transit International Pty Ltd (2002) 55 NSWLR 64; [2002] NSWSC 525 Lloyd v Great Western Dairies Company [1907] 2 KB 727 Kirby v Sanderson Motors Pty Ltd (2001) 54 NSWLR 135; [2002] NSWCA 44 Marino v Esanda Ltd [1986] VR 735 McGuirk v University of New South Wales [2009] NSWSC 1424 O'Grady v North Queensland Co. Limited (1990) 169 CLR 356; [1990] HCA 16 Payne v Young (1980) 145 CLR 609; [1980] HCA 54 Workers' Compensation Board of Queensland v Technical Products Pty Ltd (1988) 165 CLR 642; [1988] HCA 49 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Mark Hughes & 16 Ors (Plaintiff) Richard Michael Fong (First Defendant) Maguy Bernadette Nakhl (Second Defendant) Representation: I E Davidson SC with D Habashy (Plaintiff) T L Hollo (First Defendant); C Colquhoun (Second Defendant) File Number(s): 2016/00029923
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate