NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Caird Seven Pty Ltd v Mina Attia and Shopsmart Pharmacy Franchising Pty Ltd (No 3) [2016] NSWSC 1452 Hearing dates: 19 September 2016 Decision date: 13 October 2016 Before: Emmett AJA Decision: The Court notes the undertakings and makes the orders set out in Schedules 2 and 3 to these reasons. Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – enforcement of court orders for specific performance concerning sale of a business – whether Supreme Court has power to appoint a receiver to enforce final orders pursuant to Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 67 – appointment of receiver as part of equitable execution – whether discretion to appoint a receiver should be exercised in circumstances where there has been failure to comply with court orders – whether appointing a receiver would be fruitless and would frustrate performance of the court orders Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW), s 106 Conveyancing Act 1919 (NSW), s 66G Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), s 420 Equity Act 1880 (NSW), s 57 Real Property Act 1900 (NSW), s 57(2) Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW), s 67 Supreme Court of Judicature Act 1873 (Imp), 25(8)
Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), r 40.8 Cases Cited: Caird Seven Pty Ltd v Attia Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1088 Caird Seven Pty Ltd v Mina Attia and Shopsmart Pharmacy Franchising Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1217 Hall v Foster [2012] NSWSC 974 Holmes v Millage [1893] 1 QB 551 In the Matter of Aquaqueen International Pty Limited [2016] NSWSC 508 Maclaine Watson & Co Ltd v International Tin Council [1988] Ch 1 Owners of the Ship "Shin Kobe Maru" v Empire Shipping Company Inc (1994) 181 CLR 404; [1994] HCA 54 Texts Cited: JD Heydon, MJ Leeming and PG Turner, Meagher, Gummow and Lehane's Equity: Doctrines and Remedies (5th ed 2015, LexisNexis Butterworths) Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Caird Seven Pty Ltd (Plaintiff) Mr Mina Attia (First Defendant) Shopsmart Pharmacy Franchising Pty Ltd (Second Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Mr PD Herzfeld (Plaintiff) Mr MW Young SC (First and Second Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate