NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Webster (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 1463 Hearing dates: 12 October 2016 Date of orders: 14 October 2016 Decision date: 14 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Adamson J Decision: See paragraph [106] Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) – application for extended supervision order – final hearing – length of order only substantive issue – defendant poses unacceptable risk of committing serious sex offence – consideration of factors in s 9(3) of Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) – extended supervision order made for maximum period Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 59, 61J, 61K, 61L, 89, 97 Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) ss 3, 5B, 5C, 5I, 7(4), 9, 10, 10A, 11, 13, 21, 25 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW), s 9(1) Cases Cited: Attorney General for the State of NSW v Steadman [2013] NSWSC 170 Attorney General for the State of NSW v Steadman (No 2) [2016] NSWSC 606 Lynn v State of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 57 State of New South Wales v Conway [2011] NSWSC 925 State of New South Wales v Donovan [2015] NSWCA 280 State of New South Wales v Johnson [2016] NSWSC 267 State of New South Wales v Webster [2016] NSWSC 999 Webster v R [2006] NSWCCA 346 Category: Principal judgment Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Michael Paul Webster (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: L Fernandez (Plaintiff) D O'Neil (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate