NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: R v Chambour; R v Khallouf (No 1) [2016] NSWDC 244 Hearing dates: 26 September 2016 Date of orders: 26 September 2016 Decision date: 26 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Criminal Before: Neilson DCJ Decision: Application to admit tendency evidence refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – Evidence – Application to adduce tendency evidence – Tendency alleged to be 'to participate in physical violence using a knife with co-offenders' – In alleged tendency evidence accused did not act "with a co-offender" – Tendency to use a knife insufficient to justify admission of evidence – Insufficient similarities of evidence Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Evidence Act 1995 Cases Cited: CGL v DPP [2010] VSCA 26 DAO v R [2011] NSWCCA 63 DJS v R [2012] NSWCCA 9 IMM v The Queen [2016] HCA 14 O'Keefe v R [2009] NSWCCA 121 RHB v The Queen [2011] VSCA 295 R v Abrahamson, Unreported, 1994 Court of Criminal Appeal, South Australia, BC9405598 R v Ford [2009] NSWCCA 306 R v GAC [2007] NSWCCA 315 R v Harker [2004] NSWCCA 427 R v Matonwal & Amood [2016] NSWCCA 174 R v Milton [2004] NSWCCA 195 R v Watkins [2005] NSWCCA 164 Sokolowskyj v R NSWCCA 55 Townsend v Townsend [2001] NSWCA 136 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Director of Public Prosecutions (NSW) (Crown) George Chambour (Accused) Youssef Khallouf (Accused) Representation: Counsel: Ms R Rodger (Crown) Mr B Vasic (Accused Chambour) Ms A Francis (Accused Khallouf)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate