NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Lelikan v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) [2016] NSWSC 1467 Hearing dates: 6 October 2016 Decision date: 14 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: N Adams J Decision: The release application is granted. Catchwords: RELEASE APPLICATION – charged with being a member of a proscribed terrorist organization, the Kurdistan Workers' Party (PKK) – rebuttable presumption against bail being granted to a person charged with terrorism offence – threats in custody - no threat to the Australian community – whether the exceptional circumstances to justify grant of bail exist – whether unacceptable risks are capable of being mitigated with conditions - release application granted Legislation Cited: Bail Act 2013 (NSW) ss 17, 19 Bail Act 1978 s 9C Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) ss 3,15AA(1) (2)(a) Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) s 102.3 Cases Cited: R v NK [2016] NSWSC 498 R v Shoe Hammoud v DPP [2006] VSC 516 Haddara v DPP (Cth) [2006] VSC 8 R v Khaled Cheikho, Studdert J, NSWSC, unrep, 15.5.06 AB v R [2016] NSWCCA 191 Vinayagamoorthy & Anor v DPP (Cth) [2007] VSC 265 R v Mulahalilovic, Rothman J, NSWSC, unrep, 1.8.06 Raad v DPP [2008] VSC 330 R v Young [2006] NSWSC 1499 R v Hantis [2004] NSWSC 153 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Renas Lelikan (Applicant) Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Boulten SC (Applicant) Mr C T Anderson (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate