NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Boege v Attorney General of New South Wales [2016] NSWSC 1469 Hearing dates: On the papers Date of orders: 14 October 2016 Decision date: 14 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Harrison J Decision: Application refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – application pursuant to s 78(1) Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act for an enquiry into conviction for common assault – where three applications previously dealt with under Part 7 of the Act – where Supreme Court not satisfied that there are special facts or special circumstances to justify the taking of further action – whether Supreme Court should refuse to consider or otherwise deal with the application – application refused Legislation Cited: Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 Crimes Act 1900 Cases Cited: Application by Petronella Boege for an inquiry into conviction and sentence pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (Supreme Court (NSW), Adamson J, 27 March 2012, unrep) Application of Petronella Boege pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 (No 3) [2016] NSWSC 729 Further application of Petronella Boege pursuant to s 78 of the Crimes (Appeal and Review) Act 2001 [2015] NSWSC 1925 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Petronella Boege (Applicant) Attorney-General of NSW (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: G Wright (Respondent)
Solicitors: Crown Solicitor's Office (Respondent) File Number(s): 2016/232280 Publication restriction: Nil
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate