NSW Caselaw
District Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Casey v Hart & Hart v Casey [2016] NSWDC 317 Hearing dates: 28 October 2016 Date of orders: 25 November 2016 Decision date: 25 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Civil Before: Hatzistergos DCJ Decision: (1) Pursuant to UCPR r 28.2, the question of primary liability is severed and listed as a separate question for determination prior to the hearing of the remainder of the proceedings; (2) The orders sought in the Notice of Motion filed by the Plaintiff Casey, in paragraph [1] and in the Amended Notice of Motion, by the Plaintiff Hart in paragraphs [1](a) – (c) are declined; and (3) The Plaintiffs are to pay the Defendants' costs. Catchwords: APPEARANCES AND REPRESENTATION – separate representation of parties in interests as Plaintiff and Defendant – disapproval through costs orders – power of Court to restrain compulsory third party insurer from acting in the interests of insured Defendant
PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – separate question for determination prior to hearing of the remainder of proceedings – power of Court to control proceedings Legislation Cited: Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) s 62 Evidence Act 1995 (NSW) s 26 Motor Accidents Compensation Act 1999 (NSW) s 77, 78, 79, 81, 87, 119 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules (NSW) rr 6.1, 6.9, 6.32, 7.8, 28.2 Cases Cited: Canberra Residential Developments Pty Ltd v Brendas [2010] FCAFC 125 Elphick v Westfield Shopping Centre Management Company Pty Ltd [2011] NSWCA 356 GPI Leisure Corp Ltd v Herdsman Investments Pty Ltd (No 3) (1990) 20 NSWLR 15 Grimwade v Meagher & Ors [1995] 1 VR 446 Hodgson v Crane (2002) 55 NSWLR 199; [2002] NSWCA 276 Newcastle City Council v GIO General Limited (1997) 191 CLR 85 Roth v RTA & Ors [2009] NSWSC 295 Southwell v Bennett [2010] NSWSC 1372 Tan v Mitchell [2006] NSWCA 178 Van Eeden v Henry (2005) 62 NSWLR 301; [2005] NSWCA 14 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Ms Beverley June Casey Mr Sidney Robert Hart Representation: Counsel: Mr E Romaniuk SC with Mr M Eirth (for the Plaintiff, Casey) Mr S Harben SC (for the Defendant, Hart) Mr T Hickey (for the Plaintiff, Hart) Mr A Stone SC (for the Defendant, Casey)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate