NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: William Tomac & Anor v Antonia Elsa Papp; The Estate of Tomo Tomac [2016] NSWSC 1472 Hearing dates: 5 September 2016 Date of orders: 30 September 2016 Decision date: 30 September 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Rein J Decision: See [60] Catchwords: CONTRACTS- Whether contract "unjust"- where the defendant seeks pursuant to the Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) to set aside a Settlement Agreement on the basis of a claimed mental condition. HELD- The defendant failed to establish that she was suffering from a mental condition; HELD- Even if the defendant was suffering from the mental condition claimed in all the circumstances the Settlement Agreement was not unjust within the meaning of s.9 of the Act. HELD- Even if contrary to the above conclusions the Settlement Agreement was unjust within the meaning of the Act the Court would not exercise its discretion to set aside the contract- the plaintiffs had no knowledge of defendant's condition-there was nothing harsh, unconscionable or unfair about Settlement Agreement and the defendant was throughout the process of negotiation and settlement legally represented. Legislation Cited: Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW) Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW) Cases Cited: Antonovic v Volker (1986) 7 NSWLR 151 Autodesk Inc v Dyason (No 2) (1993) 176 CLR 300; [1993] HCA 6 Beneficial Finance Corp Ltd v Karavas (1991) 23 NSWLR 256 Citicorp Australia Ltd v O'Brien (1996) 40 NSWLR 398 Dimarti v Dimarti [2015] NSWSC 97 Elders Rural Finance Ltd v Smith (1996) 41 NSWLR 296 Elkofairi v Permanent Trustee Co Ltd [2002] NSWCA 413; (2002) 11 BPR 20,841 Mbuzi v AGL Retail Energy Ltd [2016] FCA 590 at [31] Nguyen v Taylor (1992) 27 NSWLR 48 Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd v Khoshaba [2006] NSWCA 41; (2005) 14 BPR 26,639 Riz v Perpetual Trustee Australia Limited [2007] NSWSC 1153; (2007) ANZ ConvR 615 Tonto Home Loans Australia Pty Ltd v Tavares; FirstMac Ltd v Di Benedetto; FirstMac Ltd v O'Donnell [2011] NSWCA 389; (2011) 15 BPR 29,699 West v AGC (Advances) Ltd (1986) 5 NSWLR 610 Texts Cited: Covell & Lupton's Principles of Remedies (6th edition, Lexis Nexis 2015) Category: Principal judgment Parties: William Tomac (1st Plaintiff) Valnea Tomac (2nd Plaintiff) Antonia Elsa Papp (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: L. Ellison SC, A. Gibbons (Plaintiffs) B. Levet (Defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate