NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Jones v R [2016] NSWCCA 230 Hearing dates: 7 September 2016 Decision date: 21 October 2016 Before: Macfarlan JA at [1]; Price J at [2]; Hidden AJ at [3] Decision: (1) Leave to appeal granted. (2) Appeal dismissed. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – sentence appeal – supplying large commercial quantity of prohibited drug - knowingly dealing with the proceeds of crime – possessing a prohibited weapon – aggregate sentence passed – indicative sentences of imprisonment for all three offences – whether aggregate sentence excessive – focus on whether custodial sentence warranted for possessing prohibited weapon Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 Weapons Prohibition Act 1998 Cases Cited: Hili and Jones v The Queen 242 CLR 520, [2010] HCA 45 JM v R [2014] NSWCCA 297 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Reginald Jones - Applicant Regina - Respondent Crown Representation: Counsel: M Smith (Applicant) V Lydiard (Respondent Crown)
Solicitors: McGirr Lawyers (Applicant) C. Hyland, Solicitor for Public Prosecutions (Respondent Crown) File Number(s): 2014/83999 Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Criminal Date of Decision: 10 July 2015 Before: Hanley DCJ File Number(s): 2014/83999
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate