NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: van Haandel v Byron Bay Beach Hotel Properties Pty Limited [2016] NSWSC 1484 Hearing dates: 11 October 2016 Date of orders: 20 October 2016 Decision date: 20 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity Before: Darke J Decision: Summons is dismissed with costs. Catchwords: REAL PROPERTY – options and agreements to purchase – construction of particular agreements – Put and Call Option Deed contained right of first refusal – options not exercised within stipulated periods – whether right of first refusal continues to operate Cases Cited: Australian Broadcasting Commission v Australasian Performing Right Association Limited (1973) 129 CLR 99 Dovuro v Wilkins (2000) 105 FCR 476; [2000] FCA 1902 Electricity Generation Corporation v Woodside Energy Limited (2014) 251 CLR 640; [2014] HCA 7 Pacific Carriers Limited v BNP Paribas (2004) 218 CLR 451; [2004] HCA 35 Re Strand Music Hall Co Ltd; Ex parte European and American Finance (1865) 35 Beav 153; 55 ER 853 Toll (FGCT) Pty Limited v Alphapharm Pty Limited (2004) 219 CLR 165; [2004] HCA 52 Trustees Executors and Agency Co Limited v Peters (1960) 102 CLR 537 Category: Principal judgment Parties: John van Haandel (Plaintiff) Byron Bay Beach Hotel Properties Pty Limited (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms P M Lane (Plaintiff) Mr T G R Parker SC with Mr J G Simpkins (Defendant)
Solicitors: Arnold Bloch Leibler (Plaintiff) Radcliff Taylor Lawyers (Defendant) File Number(s): 2016/27468 Publication restriction: None
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate