NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Curtis v R [2016] NSWCCA 299 Hearing dates: 19 October 2016 Decision date: 16 December 2016 Before: Payne JA at [1]; Price J at [73]; Davies J at [74]. Decision: Appeal dismissed Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against conviction – conspiracy to commit an offence of insider procuring – Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) s 11.5 – whether verdict unreasonable – appeal dismissed Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) s 5 Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 1042A, 1042D, 1043A, 1311 Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) ss 5.6, 11.5 Cases Cited: Ansari v R (2010) 241 CLR 299; [2010] HCA 18 Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd (2007) 230 CLR 89; [2007] HCA 22 M v The Queen (1994) 181 CLR 487 MFA v The Queen (2002) 213 CLR 606 R v LK; R v RK (2010) 241 CLR 177; [2010] HCA 17 R v Mansfield (2011) 251 FLR 286; [2011] WASCA 132 R v Wright [1980] VR 593 The Queen v Baden-Clay [2016] HCA 35 Texts Cited: Lyon and du Plessis, The Law of Insider Trading in Australia (Sydney: The Federation Press, 2005) Category: Principal judgment Parties: Oliver Peter Curtis (appellant) The Crown (respondent) Representation: Counsel: B Walker SC, N Owens SC, Dr R Higgins (appellant) W Abraham QC, L Crowley, R Ranken (respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate