NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Katsikas v Katsikas [2016] NSWSC 1490 Hearing dates: 7 October 2016 Decision date: 25 November 2016 Jurisdiction: Equity - Probate List Before: Lindsay J Decision: Orders (including consequential relief) for dismissal of an application for review of a decision by a Registrar, not to set aside a subpoena for production of a computer to the Court, but to adopt, by orders of the Court, a protocol agreed between counsel, for forensic examination of the computer, as bearing upon the authenticity of a controversial email central to a determination of the principal proceedings, in which the applicant (although not a party) has an interest of a proprietary nature and as a critical witness. Catchwords: PROCEDURE - Subpoenas and notice to produce at hearing – Setting aside or other relief – Application to set aside dismissed by registrar – Application for review dismissed
PROCEDURE – Inspection of property - Nature and scope of examination of computer – Forensic testing of authenticity of disputed email - Whether inspection order exceeds what is reasonable Legislation Cited: Succession Act 2006 NSW Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 NSW Cases Cited: Bailey v Bailey (1924) 34 CLR 558 Barry v Butlin (1838) 2 Moo PC 480; 12 ER 1089 In the will of Sheppard [1972] 2 NSWLR 714 Tobin v Ezekiel (2012) 83 NSWLR 757 Tomko v Plasty (No. 2) (2008) 71 NSWLR 61 Re Estate Gowing; Application for Executor's Commission [2014] NSWSC 247 Texts Cited: - Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: Plaintiff: George Katsikas Defendant/Respondent: Suzanne Katsikas Applicant: Christopher Katsikas Representation: Counsel: Applicant: M Bradford Defendant/Respondent: JEF Brown
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate