NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Coote v State of NSW and the Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority [2016] NSWSC 1492 Hearing dates: 10 August 2016 Date of orders: 28 October 2016 Decision date: 28 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Bellew J Decision: 1. The proceedings are dismissed. 2. The plaintiff is to pay the first defendant's costs as agreed or assessed. Catchwords: STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – Application for extended trading hours – Statutory requirement to advertise application by affixing notice to premises – Where notice not fixed for an extended period – Whether the validity of the application depended upon strict compliance with the notice provisions – Whether substantial compliance was sufficient – Proceedings dismissed Legislation Cited: Gaming and Liquor Administration Act 2007 (NSW) Interpretation Act 1987 (NSW) Liquor Act 2007 (NSW) Liquor Regulation 2008 (NSW) Cases Cited: Coordinated Construction Company Pty Limited v Climatech (Canberra) Pty Limited [2005] NSWCA 229 Lloyd v Police (2004) 89 SASR 383; [2004] SASC 278 Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; [1998] HCA 28 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Craig Allan Coote – Plaintiff State of NSW – First defendant The Independent Liquor and Gaming Authority – Second defendant Representation: Counsel: M Robinson SC and S McGee – Plaintiff J Emmett – Second defendant
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate