NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: Napoli v R [2016] NSWCCA 232 Hearing dates: 16 September 2016 Date of orders: 07 November 2016 Decision date: 07 November 2016 Before: Leeming JA at [1] Harrison J at [2] Wilson J at [3] Decision: Leave to appeal refused Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW - SENTENCE - conspiracy to import a commercial quantity of border controlled precursor - complaint of disproportion in the sentences imposed upon two co‑conspirators - parity principle - consideration of respective objective and subjective cases - roles of conspirators - question of whether any grievance is justified Legislation Cited: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (NSW) Criminal Code 1995 (Cth) Cases Cited: Green v The Queen (2011) 244 CLR 462; [2011] HCA 49 Jimmy v R (2010) 77 NSWLR 540; [2010] NSWCCA 60 R v Millwood [2012] NSWCCA 2 Wong v The Queen (2001) 207 CLR 584 at 608; [2001] HCA 64 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Bruno Napoli (Applicant) Regina Representation: Counsel: Mr S. Buchen with Ms. C O'Neill (Applicant) Mr L. Crowley (Commonwealth DPP)
Solicitors: GJ Goold (Applicant) Office of the Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) (Respondent) File Number(s): 2013/43573 Publication restriction: None Decision under appeal Court or tribunal: District Court of NSW Jurisdiction: Common Law - Criminal Date of Decision: 30 January 2015 Before: Hanley SC DCJ File Number(s): 2013/43573
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate