NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: State of New South Wales v Baldwin [2016] NSWSC 1498 Hearing dates: 14 October 2016 Date of orders: 14 October 2016 Decision date: 14 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law Before: Beech-Jones J Decision: Pursuant to s 5C and s 9(1)(a) of the Act the defendant be subject to a high risk sex offender extended supervision order for a period of two years and ten months from the date of the order; and
Pursuant to s 11 of the Act, direct the defendant, for the period of the extended supervision order, to comply with the conditions set out in the Schedule to the Summons. Catchwords: HIGH RISK SEX OFFENDER – application for Extended Supervision Order – no question of principle Legislation Cited: Child Protection (Offender's Registration) Act 2000 (NSW) Child Protection Offenders Prohibition Act 2004 (NSW) Crimes (High Risk Offenders) Act 2006 (NSW) Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) Cases Cited: Lynn v State of New South Wales [2016] NSWCA 57 State of New South Wales v Baldwin [2016] NSWSC 1141 State of New South Wales v Kamm [2016] NSWSC 1 Category: Procedural and other rulings Parties: State of New South Wales (Plaintiff) Wayne Norman Baldwin (Defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms G Lewer (Plaintiff) Ms A Cook (Defendant)
Solicitors: Crown Solicitor's Office Legal Aid NSW File Number(s): 2016/210954
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate