NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Roads and Maritime Services v Rodger Wilson [2016] NSWSC 1499 Hearing dates: 14 October 2016 Date of orders: 14 October 2016 Decision date: 14 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Common Law - Administrative Law Before: Fagan J Decision: 1. Declare pursuant to s 69 of the Supreme Court Act (NSW) that the Medical Assessment Certificate and statement of reasons for decision of the third defendant issued on 8 April 2016 are void and of no effect.
2. The medical dispute is remitted to the Workers Compensation Commission of New South Wales for referral to a Medical Appeal Panel pursuant to s 328(1) of the Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (NSW) to determine the appeal from the Medical Assessment Certificate of Dr Tim Anderson issued 9 November 2015, according to law.
3. The first defendant is to pay the plaintiff's costs of these proceedings. Catchwords: JUDICIAL REVIEW – workers' compensation – appeal against decision of Appeal Panel – Appeal Panel set aside Medical Assessment Certificate of approved medical specialist – scope of Appeal Panel to re-assess whole person impairment – whether jurisdiction of Appeal Panel to reissue a Medical Assessment Certificate is limited to only those portions of assessment which were disputed on appeal – distinction between decision to revoke and decision to issue a new certificate – Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1988 (NSW), ss 287, 278 Legislation Cited: Supreme Court Act 1970 (NSW) Workers Compensation Commission Act 1987 (NSW) Workplace Injury Management and Workers Compensation Act 1998 (NSW) Cases Cited: Campbelltown City Council v Vegan (2006) 67 NSWLR 372; [2006] NSWCA 284 Drosd v Workers Compensation Nominal Insurer [2016] NSWSC 1053 New South Wales Police Force v Registrar of the Workers Compensation Commission of New South Wales [2013] NSWSC 1792 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Roads and Maritime Services (plaintiff) Rodger Wilson (1st defendant) Representation: Counsel: Ms Eraine Grotte (plaintiff) No appearance (1st defendant)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate