NSW Caselaw
Civil and Administrative Tribunal New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: CBN v Children's Guardian [2016] NSWCATAD 240 Hearing dates: 12 May 2016 Date of orders: 26 October 2016 Decision date: 26 October 2016 Jurisdiction: Administrative and Equal Opportunity Division Before: J McAteer, Senior Member E Hayes, General Member Decision: (1) The decision of the respondent dated 4 February 2015 to refuse to grant the applicant a clearance is set aside. (2) In substitution for that decision, the following decision is made; The applicant is granted a Working with Children Check clearance Catchwords: CHILD Protection – Working with children – Findings in respect of criminal allegations – Evidence – Application to exclude evidence – Inability to test evidence – Absence of witness – No information of availability of witness – Weight of evidence in absence of testing of evidence – Fairness to party – No presumption of risk s27 Legislation Cited: Administrative Decisions Review Act 1997 Child Protection (Working with Children) Act 2012 Child Protection (Prohibited Employment) Act 1998(Repealed) Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 2013 Criminal Records Act 1991 Cases Cited: Children and Young People v FZ [2011] NSWCA 111 BJB v Office of the Children's Guardian [2014] NSWCATAD 111 AYU v NSW Office of the Children's Guardian [2014] NSWCATAD 69 R v Commission for Children and Young People [2002] NSWIRComm 101 BJB v The Children's Guardian (No. 2) [2014] NSWCATAD 164 Re: Control Investments Pty Ltd v Australian Broadcasting Tribunal (No. 2) (1981) 3 ALD 88. Commission for Children and Young People v V [2002] NSWSC 949; 56 NSWLR 476 BFC v The Children's Guardian [2014] NSWCATAD 90 BFX v Children's Guardian [2014] NSWCATAD 115 BKE v Children's Guardian [2015] NSWSC 523 J v Lieschke [1987] HCA 4; (1987) 162 CLR 447 Children's Guardian v BRL [2016] NSWSC 1206 M v M (1988) 166 CLR (HCA) Office of the Children's Guardian v CFW [2016] NSWSC 1406 Category: Principal judgment Parties: CBN (Applicant) Children's Guardian (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: V Hartstein (Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate