NSW Caselaw
Supreme Court New South Wales
Medium Neutral Citation: Kazacos v Shuangling International Development Pty Ltd [2016] NSWSC 1504 Hearing dates: 30 October 2015; 2 November 2015 Decision date: 27 October 2016 Before: White J Decision: Order that the plaintiffs' claims for relief be dismissed. Catchwords: CONTRACTS — Contract for sale of land — Special condition requiring payment of deposit in two instalments — Purchaser failed to complete — Deposit paid on exchange forfeited — Property resold for a surplus — Whether Vendor entitled to payment of second instalment of deposit — Second instalment due under the contract only if purchaser fails to complete — Second instalment not in the nature of a deposit — Provision requiring payment of second instalment of deposit void as a penalty — Whether clause 9.3.1 requires that any surplus on resale and any retained deposit be credited against reasonable costs and expenses arising out of purchaser's non-compliance and of resale — Held that clause 9.3.1 requires that any surplus on resale and any retained deposit be set off against reasonable costs and expenses arising out of purchaser's non-compliance and of resale — Whether clause 9.3 requires a vendor to make an election between a right to sue for liquidated damages and a right to sue for damages for breach of contract — Held that clause 9.3 gives a vendor a choice between remedies not between rights — Choice between remedies can be kept open until judgment Cases Cited: Agricultural and Rural Finance Pty Ltd v Gardiner (2008) 238 CLR 570; [2008] HCA 57 Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2012) 247 CLR 205; [2012] HCA 30 Ashdown v Kirk [1999] 2 Qd R 1 Luu v Sovereign Developments Pty Ltd [2006] NSWCA 40; (2006) 12 BPR 23,629 Berry v Mahony [1933] VLR 314 Boyarsky v Taylor [2008] NSWSC 1415; (2008) 14 BPR 26,553 BP Refinery (Westernport) Pty Ltd v President, Councillors and Ratepayers of the Shire of Hastings (1977) 180 CLR 266 Brien v Dwyer (1978) 141 CLR 378; [1978] HCA 50 Brien v Dwyer [1976] 2 NSWLR 420 Buchanan v Dunstan [2007] NSWSC 248; (2007) 13 BPR 24,521 Cloud Top Pty Ltd v Toma Services Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 568 Consolidated Credit Network Pty Ltd v Illawarra Retirement Trust Ltd (No. 2) [2005] NSWSC 1007 Cox v Parker (1987) 5 BPR 97,339 Delbridge v Low [1990] 2 Qd R 317 Denby v Khyat (1931) 26 Tas LR 152 Donnellan v Garlick [2006] NSWSC 132; (2006) 12 BPR 23,571 Galafassi v Kelly (2014) 87 NSWLR 119; [2014] NSWCA 190 Gogard Pty Ltd v Satnaq Pty Ltd [1999] NSWSC 1283; (1999) 9 BPR 17,171 Hadley v Baxendale (1854) 9 Ex 341; 156 ER 145 Havyn Pty Ltd v Webster [2005] NSWCA 182; (2005) 12 BPR 22,837 Hearse v Pallister [2008] NSWSC 504 Hoskins v Rule [1952] NZLR 827 Howe v Smith (1884) 27 Ch D 89 Iannello v Sharpe (2007) 69 NSWLR 452; [2007] NSWCA 61 Jampco Pty Ltd v Cameron (No. 2) (1985) 3 NSWLR 391 Jampco Pty Ltd v Cameron (No. 2) (1986) NSW ConvR 55-275 Kinleyside v Irwin [1961] WAR 169 Mallett v Jones [1959] VR 122 McDonald v Dennys Lascelles Ltd (1933) 48 CLR 457 Pitt v Curotta (1932) 48 WN (NSW) 156 Rossco Developments Pty Ltd v O'Halloran (1980) 42 FLR 236 Soper v Arnold (1889) 14 App Cas 429 Talley v Wolsey-Neech (1979) 38 P & CR 45 Taylor v Raglan Developments Pty Ltd [1981] 2 NSWLR 117 Tiplady v Gold Coast Carlton Pty Ltd (1984) ATPR 40-491 United Australia Ltd v Barclay's Bank Ltd [1941] AC 1 Wallace-Turner v Cole (1983) 46 P & CR 164 Ward v Ellerton (1927) VLR 264 Ward v Ellerton [1927] VLR 494 Category: Principal judgment Parties: Peter Kazacos (1st Plaintiff) Vicki Kazacos (2nd Plaintiff) Shuangling International Development Pty Ltd (1st Defendant) Xiuyan Guan (2nd Defendant) Representation: Counsel: D D Knoll (Plaintiffs) D H Mitchell with C E O'Neill (Defendants)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate