NSW Caselaw
Court of Criminal Appeal Supreme Court New South Wales Medium Neutral Citation: AGF v R [2016] NSWCCA 236 Hearing dates: 7 October 2016 Decision date: 21 October 2016 Before: Meagher JA at [1]; Harrison J at [2]; R A Hulme J at [3] Decision: 1. Time to file Notice of Application for Leave to Appeal extended to 1 June 2016. 2. Leave to appeal granted and appeal allowed. 3. Sentences imposed in the District Court on 6 November 2009 quashed and the following sentences imposed: Count 1 (2007/16340-036): imprisonment for a fixed term of 11 months commencing on 16 June 2008. Count 4 (2007/16340-038): imprisonment for a fixed term of imprisonment of 2 years 8 months commencing on 16 May 2009. Count 5 (2007/16340-005): imprisonment for a fixed term of 11 months commencing 16 May 2009. Counts 6 and 7 (2007/16340-039 & 040): on each, imprisonment for a fixed term of 2 years 8 months commencing 16 April 2010. Counts 8 and 9 (2007/16340-041 & 042): on each, imprisonment for a fixed term of 2 years 8 months commencing 16 March 2011. Count 10 (2007/16340-043): imprisonment for a fixed term of 3 years 7 months commencing 16 March 2011. Count 11 (2007/16340-016): imprisonment for a fixed term of 1 year 4 months commencing 16 February 2012. Count 13 (2007/16340-019) (and taking into account the Form 1 offence): imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of 4 years 6 months and a balance of the term of the sentence of 4 years 6 months. The sentence is to commence 16 December 2012. The non-parole period will expire on 15 June 2017 at which time the applicant will become eligible for release on parole. The total term will expire on 15 December 2021. Catchwords: CRIMINAL LAW – appeal against sentence – child sexual assault – significant delay – applicant sentenced on the basis that he had a prior conviction for child sexual assault – where prior conviction quashed on appeal after sentencing for present offences – prior conviction had no impact on sentence – judge not made aware of applicant's assistance to authorities – new evidence of assistance received – assistance worthy of reduction in sentence – applicant re-sentenced – appeal allowed Legislation Cited: Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) ss 61, 61M(1), 61O(1), 66C(2), 66D, 61J Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) ss 23, 44 Criminal Code (Cth) s 474.19 Cases Cited: Betts v The Queen (2016) 90 ALJR 758; [2016] HCA 25 Kentwell v The Queen (2014) 252 CLR 601; [2014] HCA 37 Khoury v R (2011) 209 A Crim R 509; [2011] NSWCCA 118 Many v R (1990) 51 A Crim R 54 R v Cartwright (1989) 17 NSWLR 243 Category: Principal judgment Parties: AGF (Applicant) Regina (Respondent) Representation: Counsel: Mr P Boulten SC (Applicant) Ms B Baker (Crown)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate